Reason #1: I read the books successively without a gap
Reason #2: One of these books doesn’t deserve a separate post
Reason #3: I’m also a teensy-weensy bit lazy (this had the most insignificant impact on the decision, really :D)
Freakonomics is the result of an economist asking questions (and answering them) that typical economists never ask. For example: ‘What do Sumo wrestlers and school teachers have in common?’ (DO NOT try to guess!) Steven Levitt answers such questions by digging into huge amounts of data, analyzing them from a never-seen-before perspective and with Stephen Dubner, presents it on a platter through this book – all we have to do is digest it…if we are ready to digest and believe the facts.
Despite the name, Freakonomics is neither freaky (maybe it is in the mind of a typical economist) nor ‘technically economics’; atleast not the way we know economics to be. The book was fun to read and the authors added a good dosage of humor (Don’t expect to go LOL-ing for every page though, it isn’t a joke book right? Besides what are presented here are solid facts)
I felt that no other book can explain human psychology and nature so perfectly…
Economics or for that matter anything boils down to one simple statement – People respond to incentives…is there any other sentence that explains human nature so correctly?
The book gives a clear explanation of many weird yet commonplace things with lots of data to back it, that you can’t help but believe. While reading the book, at the end of some revelations, I was unable to believe I believed what was stated! (I'm even now in a state of unable to believe that I believe – some intensive googling needed to make it settle in my head)
Hmm…hence I had a good incentive to read Superfreakonomics, immediately after.
To tell the truth, Superfreakonomics is nothing like its title, it should’ve probably been named 'Subfreakonomics' – for that’s what the book is. The book doesn’t live up to its expectations as the sequel of Freakonomics; the book reveals too little a number of facts and goes on and on and on about them till you feel, ‘Enough! What’s the next startling fact?’ Maybe the authors should’ve done more research and garnered enough number of facts before going for the second book.
The only topic I liked in Superfreakonomics is its eye-opener on Global warming – I just read this today, so I still didn’t digest it (The next stage would be unable to believe…blah blah)
So are these books recommended?
Freakonomics – yep!
Superfreakonomics – not really
In case you’re thinking that these books are too technical/ complex…
…I found these books to be much much less (actually nowhere near) complicated than The Monk Who Sold His Ferrari...I still have to come out of that trauma, only time can heal certain wounds! :(